top

images聯絡我們 images
facebook Share

詳細資料

編號 49105
期刊名 教育資料與圖書館學
Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences
題名 網路化檔案評量環境下教學者評、學生自評與同儕 互評之信效度比較| 全文可取得 |     
Comparisons of Reliability and Validity among Instructor Assessment, Student Self-Assessment and Peer-Assessment under Web-Based Portfolio Assessment Environment
作者 張基成
Chi-Cheng Chang

吳明芳
Ming-Fun Wu
 
語言 中文
卷期/出版年月 49卷1期
出版年月 October 2011
起迄頁 135~170
文章類型 研究論文
中文摘要 本研究比較網路化檔案評量環境下教學者評、學生自評與同儕互評的信效度。研究樣本為某高職二年級修習「計算機應用」課程的七十二位學生。學生使用網路化檔案評量系統進行檔案的製作、觀摩、自評與同儕互評,教師透過系統檢視學生的檔案並評量其學習表現。在三種評量結果之間差異上,教學者評、學生自評、同儕互評三種評量結果有顯著差異,其中教學者評量最為嚴格、其次為學生自評,同儕互評最為寬鬆。在三種評量結果之間一致性上,僅自評與教師評之間具一致性。自評與同儕互評之間、同儕互評與教學者評之間,都不具一致性。在三種評量結果與測驗成績一致性上,教學者評分結果與測驗成績具高度一致性,學生自評與測驗成績亦具高度一致性;而同儕互評結果與測驗成績一致性低。
英文摘要 This study compares the reliable and validity among instructor assessment, student self-assessment and peer-assessment under the Web-based portfolio assessment environment. The research samples consist of 72 students who take “Computer Application” course of the second grade in some vocational high school. The students use the Web-based portfolio assessment system for creating their portfolio, emulating peers’ portfolio, and performing self-assessment and peer-assessment. The teacher uses the system for reviewing and assessing students’ learning performances. In regard to the difference among the three assessment approaches, there exists a significant difference among the three approaches. Instructor assessment is most rigorous, while peer-assessment is most slack. In regard to the correlation among the three assessment approaches, there exists a significant consistency between self-assessment and instructor assessment. There exist inconsistencies between self-assessment and peer-assessment as well as peer-assessment and instructor assessment. In regard to the correlation among the three assessment results and test score, there exist a high consistency between instructor assessment and test score. As well, there exist a high consistency between self-assessment and test score. However, the consistency between peer-assessment and test score is inadequate.
中文關鍵字 網路化學習歷程檔案;網路化檔案評量;自評;同儕互評;
英文關鍵字 Web-based portfolio;Web-based portfolio assessment;Self-assessment;Peer-assessment;
Metadata METS    DOAJ    DC    MODS    RSS1.0    RSS2.0   
中文APA
引文格式
張基成 、吳明芳 (2011)。網路化檔案評量環境下教學者評、學生自評與同儕 互評之信效度比較。教育資料與圖書館學49(1),135-170。 
英文APA
引文格式
Chang, C. C., & Wu, M. F.(2011). Comparisons of Reliability and Validity among Instructor Assessment, Student Self-Assessment and Peer-Assessment under Web-Based Portfolio Assessment Environment. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 49(1), 135-170. 
中文芝加哥
引文格式
張基成 、吳明芳 。「網路化檔案評量環境下教學者評、學生自評與同儕 互評之信效度比較」,教育資料與圖書館學49卷,1期(2011):135-170。 
英文芝加哥
引文格式
Chi-Cheng Chang and Ming-Fun Wu , "Comparisons of Reliability and Validity among Instructor Assessment, Student Self-Assessment and Peer-Assessment under Web-Based Portfolio Assessment Environment," Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences 49, no. 1(October 2011): 135-170. 
Copyright © 2013 淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系  ISSN:1013-090X  DOI:10.6120/JoEMLS
出版者:淡江大學出版中心  地址:25137台灣新北市淡水區英專路151號
電話:(02)26215656轉2382  E-mail:joemls@mail2.tku.edu.tw